Search
 
information for
Email Newsletter Subscription
Sign up to receive Alliance to Save Energy newsletters!

act now

Find us on Facebook

Energy Management Survey Results

In November 2005, the Alliance to Save Energy conducted a survey to understand the variation in current energy management practices. The survey posed the following question to energy management professionals: “Which of the following best describes the energy cost-reduction strategy taken by your organization?” Respondents were asked to indicate which ONE of the following selections best answers that question:

  • Pay the fuel bill on time to avoid late fees [Do Nothing];
  • Price-shop for the lowest fuel prices available [Price Shop];
  • Pursue occasional, low-cost (non-capital) projects when time and resources permit [OPEX projects];
  • Select strategic, capital (hardware) projects that improve plant performance [CAPEX projects]; or
  • Follow a multi-year business plan that budgets for projects and staff training, and identifies energy-smart standard operating procedures [Business Plan].

Full descriptions of all five energy management strategies.

TABLE 1: Summary of Survey Responses*

Preferred Energy
Management Style
End-User Respondents
Industrial Institutional All End­Users
1. Do Nothing 4% 11% 6%
2. Price Shop 5% 15% 8%
3. OPEX Projects 26% 15% 23%
4. CAPEX Projects 37% 22% 33%
5. Business Plan 27% 37% 30%
Total Respondents 73 27 100
Percent of Respondents 73% 27% 100%

* Note that this is not a scientific survey. A scientific survey would require a random sample of responses from the universe of large, energy-using facilities. Instead, respondents were drawn from the Alliance to Save Energy’s communications database. Respondents were decision-makers who are at least motivated to think about their organizations’ energy management, because they have done one of the following: (1) attended a workshop of conference on energy efficiency, or (2) subscribed to the Alliance’s communications to receive current program information. Therefore, the survey did not reach energy-users who are generally uninterested in controlling their energy costs.



privacy statement | feedback | home